<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little 15 Year Old Miley Cyrus Went Disney Wild for Vanity Fair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miley Cyrus Still Hurting over Vanity Fair Fiasco Releases 7 Things Music Video at Hollywooditoria</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Miley Cyrus Still Hurting over Vanity Fair Fiasco Releases 7 Things Music Video at Hollywooditoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-625</guid>
		<description>[...] Cyrus / Hannah Montana posed almost naked for a pictorial in Vanity Fair magazine a while back, sometime in April 2008. Apparently the sight of suggestively nude Miley Cyrus failed to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cyrus / Hannah Montana posed almost naked for a pictorial in Vanity Fair magazine a while back, sometime in April 2008. Apparently the sight of suggestively nude Miley Cyrus failed to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorkelweasel</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorkelweasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-380</guid>
		<description>What pandora said.  This isn't "child pornography".  Even non-sexual (art, medical, etc.) nude photos of minors aren't child pornography.  In the US at least, that is legally defined as photographic depictions of minors engaging in sexual or excretory activities, or lascivious displays of the genitals.
 So, frakkin' calm down.  And why pretend that post-pubescents are not sexual people. We all know better than that, so don't act so shocked.  Especially when the only reason you are on this site to begin with is to get nudie pics of young women.

Admin: If it *were* child porn, you'd be arrested too, for distributing copies; in that regard, be very glad that the Emma Watson see-thru panties pics you've posted were taken shortly after her 18 b-day.  An argument could be made that they aren't "lascivious", of course, but "child porn hysteria" is riding high.

Cyrus herself takes and (I guess via her website, I'm not sure) apparently distributes far sexier pics of herself than this, including of her in panties and a thin shirt with no bra, lesbianistic suggestiveness, pulling her shirt down to show her bra and cleavage, and bending over and pulling her pants down to show her panties.  Her hit song, while not blatantly sexual like "I Touch Myself" or something, is all about teen sexual longing. So, her official statement on the VF photoshoot is hypocritical nonsense that Disney probably wrote for her and contractually forced her to issue.  I'd bet anyone here $100 that before she is 18, she'll regularly be dressing like a little whore, just like Milano, Spears and Aguilera before her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What pandora said.  This isn&#8217;t &#8220;child pornography&#8221;.  Even non-sexual (art, medical, etc.) nude photos of minors aren&#8217;t child pornography.  In the US at least, that is legally defined as photographic depictions of minors engaging in sexual or excretory activities, or lascivious displays of the genitals.<br />
 So, frakkin&#8217; calm down.  And why pretend that post-pubescents are not sexual people. We all know better than that, so don&#8217;t act so shocked.  Especially when the only reason you are on this site to begin with is to get nudie pics of young women.</p>
<p>Admin: If it *were* child porn, you&#8217;d be arrested too, for distributing copies; in that regard, be very glad that the Emma Watson see-thru panties pics you&#8217;ve posted were taken shortly after her 18 b-day.  An argument could be made that they aren&#8217;t &#8220;lascivious&#8221;, of course, but &#8220;child porn hysteria&#8221; is riding high.</p>
<p>Cyrus herself takes and (I guess via her website, I&#8217;m not sure) apparently distributes far sexier pics of herself than this, including of her in panties and a thin shirt with no bra, lesbianistic suggestiveness, pulling her shirt down to show her bra and cleavage, and bending over and pulling her pants down to show her panties.  Her hit song, while not blatantly sexual like &#8220;I Touch Myself&#8221; or something, is all about teen sexual longing. So, her official statement on the VF photoshoot is hypocritical nonsense that Disney probably wrote for her and contractually forced her to issue.  I&#8217;d bet anyone here $100 that before she is 18, she&#8217;ll regularly be dressing like a little whore, just like Milano, Spears and Aguilera before her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus Got Milk &#124; hollywooditoria</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus Got Milk &#124; hollywooditoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] little 15 year old Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana was participating in a perverse photoshoot for Vanity Fair magazine, and now she&#8217;s ready for a tad of hardcore. Here is the synopsis: “Actress by day. Rocker [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little 15 year old Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana was participating in a perverse photoshoot for Vanity Fair magazine, and now she&#8217;s ready for a tad of hardcore. Here is the synopsis: “Actress by day. Rocker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-329</guid>
		<description>i think that the pics are artistic and classy all she is showing is her back!!!! if people keep picking at her she going to end up another britney spears!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that the pics are artistic and classy all she is showing is her back!!!! if people keep picking at her she going to end up another britney spears!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Ready for Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana Playboy's Pictorial &#124; hollywooditoria</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Ready for Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana Playboy's Pictorial &#124; hollywooditoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-295</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s not enough that Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana came on the edge of porn with her pictorial for Vanity Fair magazine, but now the Disney $1 billion-by-18 wild, wild, wild wonder hag got an open invitation from none [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s not enough that Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana came on the edge of porn with her pictorial for Vanity Fair magazine, but now the Disney $1 billion-by-18 wild, wild, wild wonder hag got an open invitation from none [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-258</guid>
		<description>mmergott, I completely agree with you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmergott, I completely agree with you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ioanna</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ioanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Yeah, well...if the photographer should be charged with child pornography, what should the parents be charged with? But hey, the girl is supposed to be worth 1 billion dollars by the time she's 18, so...I guess they're good at whatever it is they're doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well&#8230;if the photographer should be charged with child pornography, what should the parents be charged with? But hey, the girl is supposed to be worth 1 billion dollars by the time she&#8217;s 18, so&#8230;I guess they&#8217;re good at whatever it is they&#8217;re doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmergott</title>
		<link>http://www.hollywooditoria.com/2008/04/28/little-15-year-old-miley-cyrus-went-disney-wild-for-vanity-fair/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>mmergott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 05:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hollywooditoria.com/?p=2626#comment-242</guid>
		<description>The photographer of the vanity affair pictorial should be charged with child pornography.  If I were to take the same pictures of a teenager and authorities had found them I would be charged with child pornography and sent to jail.  Vanity affair and this photographer should receive the same punishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photographer of the vanity affair pictorial should be charged with child pornography.  If I were to take the same pictures of a teenager and authorities had found them I would be charged with child pornography and sent to jail.  Vanity affair and this photographer should receive the same punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
